Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

Sapro Fact Sheet: That White Fungus


Recommended Posts

Seen a lot if posts here and on Alberta outdoorsmen forum, I found that being informed is important before jumping to conclusions.

 

Found this on the SRD site.

 

http://www.srd.alberta.ca/FishWildlife/WildlifeDiseases/documents/SaprolegniosisFactSheet-MAR-2010.pdf

 

The only thing I was left wondering is why there seems to be a greater occurrence this year? Cyclical? More large browns spawning? Great spore survival?

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen a lot if posts here and on Alberta outdoorsmen forum, I found that being informed is important before jumping to conclusions.

 

Found this on the SRD site.

 

http://www.srd.alber...et-MAR-2010.pdf

 

The only thing I was left wondering is why there seems to be a greater occurrence this year? Cyclical? More large browns spawning? Great spore survival?

 

As a child, I had systemic yeast/fungal infections. My partner did her Masters in mycology. In medical mycology, apparently, once someone is infected, they will always be infected, it just takes the right conditions to bloom. I think that this year was an abnormally stressful year on the fish, 2 months of run-off coupled with heavy fishing might have taken their toll.

 

I think that it might be cyclical, because there is going to be an age category of fish that it seems to affect (10+ years old, for example), the young fry are going to be born into an environment with higher levels of the spores available, more likely to catch the fungus, and then express in 10 years (if that is indeed the age category) when/if the conditions are optimized.

 

I am guessing that the answer will be in the water chemistry. When my partner would make her media on which to grow the fungus, incredibly minute changes of the same compounds would allow one type of fungus to grow, but inhibit another.

 

I certainly am not ascribing to know the answer, but I am certain that it is more complicated than a simple cycle.

I think that the answers will lay in answering the questions:

Why brown trout? Why older brown trout? Why males? (Rainbows and whitefish seem unaffected, despite being salmonids)

Is this a systemic disease or is it acquired purely from the environment?

In a laboratory environment, what conditions optimize the growth of sapro, and how does that correlate to this year's environmental conditions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a child, I had systemic yeast/fungal infections. My partner did her Masters in mycology. In medical mycology, apparently, once someone is infected, they will always be infected, it just takes the right conditions to bloom. I think that this year was an abnormally stressful year on the fish, 2 months of run-off coupled with heavy fishing might have taken their toll.

 

I think that it might be cyclical, because there is going to be an age category of fish that it seems to affect (10+ years old, for example), the young fry are going to be born into an environment with higher levels of the spores available, more likely to catch the fungus, and then express in 10 years (if that is indeed the age category) when/if the conditions are optimized.

 

I am guessing that the answer will be in the water chemistry. When my partner would make her media on which to grow the fungus, incredibly minute changes of the same compounds would allow one type of fungus to grow, but inhibit another.

 

I certainly am not ascribing to know the answer, but I am certain that it is more complicated than a simple cycle.

I think that the answers will lay in answering the questions:

Why brown trout? Why older brown trout? Why males? (Rainbows and whitefish seem unaffected, despite being salmonids)

Is this a systemic disease or is it acquired purely from the environment?

In a laboratory environment, what conditions optimize the growth of sapro, and how does that correlate to this year's environmental conditions?

 

 

Makes you wonder if we should be promoting less handling of fish (fewer glory shots) as its when the protective mucus is removed that fish are more susceptible to the fungus obviously we see more Browns because of the time of year with lower water levels and a fall spawning period and increased stress. Higher and colder water and a spring spawn may have to do with less Rainbows being affected with fungus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should add one more factor into this, and that is that browns are a non-native species. I know that the rainbows are not native to the bow, but at least they are native to this part of the world, and as a result they could be more resistant to this type of fungus. Browns are not native to North America at all, and maybe that makes them more susceptable to deseases that occur here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My partner is a mycologist. She thinks that the problem IS the cold water. I definitely saw sapro on the big browns in the August. While the spawn and handling exacerbate the problem, I do not think that it is the cause.

 

Her insight was mould in almost every form thrives in low-light conditions. Certain moulds will favour certain temperature ranges and chemical compositions. Sapro seems to favour hard water conditions with low temperatures. With that in mind, the optimized conditions were probably caused by the cold, dirty water during the super long run-off.

 

Even when the fish is dead, the sapro continues to grow and infect nearby fish.

 

While it is technically illegal, I think that any dead (or close to dead) fish should be removed from the river.

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My partner is a mycologist. She thinks that the problem IS the cold water. I definitely saw sapro on the big browns in the August. While the spawn and handling exacerbate the problem, I do not think that it is the cause.

 

Her insight was mould in almost every form thrives in low-light conditions. Certain moulds will favour certain temperature ranges and chemical compositions. Sapro seems to favour hard water conditions with low temperatures. With that in mind, the optimized conditions were probably caused by the cold, dirty water during the super long run-off.

 

Even when the fish is dead, the sapro continues to grow and infect nearby fish.

 

While it is technically illegal, I think that any dead (or close to dead) fish should be removed from the river.

What do you think?

 

It is illegal but I really do wish we had more info on this and the opportunity to cull fish infected out of the system but right now the law doesn’t allow it. It seems to be a particularly bad year for the fungus; I have seen it most years but never as bad as this. It really does seem to rear it’s head during the fall in spawning fish, and I imagine other Trout pick it up from damaged spawner's. I remember seeing this in BC with the Kokanee during the spawn cycle on some of the inland lakes.

I’ve read that the instance is much higher among male large fish as males fight over females and territory. I would imagine if you are using a cloth mesh net you will encourage spread of the infection, something to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think better fish handling is defined key to limit the odds on non infected fish! I've define tilt seen this on fish my whole life so I don't think removing the odd fish will eliminate the problem might slow some stuff down would be interesting to know if the low waters and higher condensed fish populations the last few seasons has something to do with a higher infection rate... I like the rubber nets far better than regular mesh I'm on board with doc and wettin your hands even during the off season fishing now to protect the slime is critical for sure in trying to limit the slime removed in tougher living conditions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard of one fish caught downtown and I would be more willing to bet it either got dumped from a tank in china town or fry are escaping from the hippo tank at the zoo.. I doubt they have anything to do with the fungus but super crazy to see that one was in the bow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...