DonAndersen Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Folks, Below is and abstract from a ACA funded report. TESTING RAINBOW SENTINEL TROUT FROM SOUTHERN ALBERTA RIVERS FOR WHIRLING DISEASE (2004) Prepared for Alberta Conservation Association By: Dr. Jacob John John Derksen, M.Sc. Aquculture Centre of Excellence Lethbridge Community College March 2005 Abstract This report presents the results of testing larval, sentinel rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), exposed to lentic areas populated by T. tubifex, for the presence of the Whirling Disease pathogen (Myxobolus cerebralis) in Southern Alberta waters, specifically, the Crowsnest, Castle, Bow and Elbow rivers. The methodology adopted for detection of the organism in fish, was the Single Round, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), designed against the 18S rDNA gene in the organism. A total of 1545 sentinel fish, pooled in groups of 5, were processed for DNA extraction from a total of 9 sites. Positive and negative test controls revealed no signs of contamination or false results. Results from all tested fish indicated no presence of the pathogen. The takeaway from the report is that it only took from 2003 when the samples were caught to 2017 for the disease to scatter to every water shed tested. Parks are working Johnson Lake but by the spread, the source or sources could have been anywhere. The rivers tested are the most heavily visited rivers in Alberta. If you wish a copy of the full report, I can send it along [ need your real email] or you can contact the ACA directly. regards, Don Quote
BurningChrome Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 9 hours ago, DonAndersen said: The takeaway from the report is that it only took from 2003 when the samples were caught to 2017 for the disease to scatter to every water shed tested. Parks are working Johnson Lake but by the spread, the source or sources could have been anywhere. The rivers tested are the most heavily visited rivers in Alberta. Also the next disease or invasive species will spread just as quickly unless people start cleaning their boats and gear properly between water bodies. 1 Quote
CROOKSIE Posted April 7, 2018 Posted April 7, 2018 I don't know if I would call 14yrs a quick process at all. 1 Quote
DonAndersen Posted April 8, 2018 Author Posted April 8, 2018 The disease now covers at least 1/3 of Alberta. Quote
BurningChrome Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 On 4/7/2018 at 12:53 AM, CROOKSIE said: I don't know if I would call 14yrs a quick process at all. That's if you assume that it was introduced into Alberta waters immediately after the last test in 2003. But yeah, let's focus on whether or not 14 years is quick because that's the real issue here. 2 1 Quote
CROOKSIE Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 I agree there is an issue here for sure, and that fisherman can help somewhat to prevent further spread. But i also know that you can not blame fisherman entirely. These are recreational waterways with a lot of people, and wild life. 1 Quote
DonAndersen Posted May 14, 2018 Author Posted May 14, 2018 I do not blame fishermen, I really lay the blame on the lack of effort on behalf of Govt, travelling Angler's or commercial guiding operations for taking absolutely no effort to prevent WD arriving . Oh sure, others could also be the culprits however, but that doesn't minimize the contempt we should all have for those that did nothing. As far as Angler's getting all hot and bothered about doing something NOW.. Do not you realize WD is in evey watershed from the N. Sask south. Too little effort taken far too late. Don 2 1 Quote
CROOKSIE Posted May 14, 2018 Posted May 14, 2018 2 hours ago, DonAndersen said: I do not blame fishermen, I really lay the blame on the lack of effort on behalf of Govt, travelling Angler's or commercial guiding operations for taking absolutely no effort to prevent WD arriving . Oh sure, others could also be the culprits however, but that doesn't minimize the contempt we should all have for those that did nothing. As far as Angler's getting all hot and bothered about doing something NOW.. Do not you realize WD is in evey watershed from the N. Sask south. Too little effort taken far too late. Don Totally agree, well said. Quote
BowLurker Posted August 5 Posted August 5 How did Montana and Idaho fare after their battles with WD? I hear many different stories, some on podcast, some via 'the big 3' youtube videos that are out there. Some ( a lot ) of the local podcasts from the area seem to feel it's over down yonder, but always present. There are other scientific guests that say it will always be around and bleach is your friend. Is it more enforcement? More manpower? For someone that hears a lot about a mostly cyclical lifespan, not withstanding the terrible side of this parasite, how did they recover down south? I'm sure that the two states have mostly the same problems with tailwater drought/flood as we do here..? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.