Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

hydropsyche

Members
  • Posts

    890
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hydropsyche

  1. Whether its economically viable or not isn't the issue here. Thats the chicken raisers' concern. The issue is if someone should be banned from doing it without just cause. This has been a very interesting thread so far but I haven't seen any arguments justifying forcing my neighbour to twist his chickens' necks. Disease, noise, neglect (and scorn for hippy tree huggers :-) ) are the only arguments I've seen so far and that can happen with cat ladies and puppy mills.

     

    If anything should be banned, it should be body piercings, hip-hop and mohawks (what's with that, anyway?)

  2. When I moved into my house in Renfrew about 10 yrs ago, I discovered my neighbour had been raising them for years (Colourful Italian. I like Italians. He passed away. Chickens are gone now). He didn't do it for trendy reasons. About 6 bantam's and a rooster. We heard the rooster every once in a while and I liked the sound. He kept them in a little coup that was heated. I don't think he brought them in during the winter. That would be creepy.

     

    I've heard of people keeping pigs as pets. And rabbits. And gerbils. And dogs. All edible in some cultures so can be classified as stock. The arguments against chickens can be used on all of these.

     

    I agree a line has to be drawn somewhere but I don’t think a few chickens will turn Calgary into a third world. If it gets out of hand, then rethink it. If a neighbour complains to by-law, they investigate. (Have you heard about the cat lady down the street??)

     

    Now fire pits……those should be banned outright (just kidding).

     

  3. Well in another life I played in a blues-rock band. Old Robert Johnson tunes and the like.

     

    You're kiding. Acoustic? I love Johnson. So few people know how much he shaped what we hear today.

     

    On harp, I dabble a bit and I can get a bend but not if I'm using my tonge. Its hard to describe. Not to be rude, but you start with a little kiss and at the end you are deepthroating. Your mouth cavity starts small and goes as large as you can get it (you can't bend blowing out).

     

  4. Maybe it's going to mean that instead of fishing for 9 days you fish for 3 - but that's the whole point now, isn't it? I don't know too many folks who can afford to be in the EKs but can't afford $20/day.

     

    So everyone is staying away on principle? I can guarantee you there are people who can't afford it. Maybe the people who used to fish 9 and now only 3 are staying away 6 days on principle?

     

    And yes, you're exactly right. It IS about the experience.

     

    Actually, it is ONLY about the experience. It had nothing to do with the fish.

     

    That's why some of us shell out a fair amount of coin to fish private waters right here in Alberta, whether that be on Palmer, Lake A, Elliot's, or otherwise. That's why there are quite a few very successful private lakes right here in Calgary. You fish Elliot, right Hydro? What do you think it would look like there if they opened it up to the public? How would the experience change?

     

    A person digging a hole in their backyard, stocking it with fish and charging admission is not comparable to a public natural resource (so I don't feel hypocritical and I didn't displace anyone because I had more money then them). No question people will pay more for a better experience and the crafters of the AMP knew it. Question is, was it just?

     

    They've done different things elsewhere. In Montana, some rivers have no nonresident float fishing on certain days of the week on stretches that rotate. For example, no NR float fishing from Glenmore to 22X on Mondays and Tuesdays, 22X to Mac on Wednesdays and Thursdays, and Mac to Carseland on Fridays and Saturdays. Again, this works because a very high percentage of rods are not in hands of MT residents.?

     

    That is the creative problem solving I'm talking about. Its not based on ability to pay. Bravo.

     

    And we haven't even touched on the benefit that all those dollars flowing into the fisheries is going to do. I've seen more enforcement in BC in a year than I've seen here my whole life, and there's a lot more water to enforce on in BC.

     

    No doubt more $ is a good thing but does the ends justify the means? Was there more equitable ways to raise funds? Jacking up the cost of something to limit access has its victims. Maybe they deserve it. They should work harder to go to school or whatever or should have been born to a richer family, but the fact remains their ability to access the river was diminished.

     

    Finally, if you grab a map and see how they've assigned classification, you'll also see that there are huge expanses of creeky rivery wilderness where you can fish to your heart's content without a stamp.

     

    Ah. "Trash" fish. I don't see why the people who wanted the Elk to themselves couldn't do the same thing. Maybe they didn't want that kind of experience?

     

    The gist of my post was people sitting around a table......well, no need to retype it. Its right above.

     

     

  5. If decisions about fisheries management are being made based solely on the fishing experience and not the fish, doesn't that make us a bunch of selfish greedy snobs? The higher the price, the less people on the water and the better it will be for *me*.

     

    I think we're forgetting that a lot of people don't eat and breathe fishing. They may be camping in the area and may have a rod in the trunk and may want do a bit of fishing to kill time only to discover the cost of that two hour excursion. Natural resources belong to everyone, not just us. What is their perception of fanatical anglers forming committees and sitting in a room trying to come up with ways to make their fishing experience more enjoyable? They may not agree with those of us with our Z-axis' with 2500 reels and Simms waders.

     

    I, for one, don't want to see what's happen in the UK and elsewhere. Where the common folk are relegated to fishing for trash fish because they can't afford a membership on an absconded exclusive river running through their backyard. The attitude I see emerging around me is just the first step down this slippery slope.

     

    Remember, I’m only talking about AMP’s based solely on the fishing experience. I don’t know what the solution should be for truly troubled waters. Total ban? Only residents? Only residents and rich aliens? Lotteries?

     

    Rusty may want to shake the hands of those who stay away on principle even though they can afford it but I’m wonder if those who can’t would want to shake back (no offence intended, Rusty. Just a different point of view).

     

    (ps. Jack Laydon would be proud of me, eh?)

     

  6. Where abouts do you guys find the syringes to fill the lace?

     

    I brought my liquid lace into the pharmacy and showed it to them to explain why I was asking for one. I got a strange look and they said "We only have one left".

     

    Keep your sleeves rolled up.

     

  7. Not much to offer other then the obvious.

     

    If you are finding fish on the end of your line that you didn't expect, then the fly to indie length is too long. 12 feet of leader in 3 feet of water (mended upstream) could give your fish 16 feet of undetected strike (12 - 3 = 8 feet in front of the fish to 8 feet behind it).

  8. I once sent Joe Ceci an email, two municipal votes ago, before I left out the door telling him why I was not going to vote for his tax is spend liberal ways. When I got back, I found a reply. One of his aids hit reply-all by mistake. It contained the phrase "it looks like someone doesn't like you cutting into his Crispy-Creme habit".

     

    I got an apology from from his aid. Never heard from Ceci. Doesn't surprise me. Why should he bother with the Crispy-Creme crowd?

     

    He got reelected with 80%. Calgary voters are pathetic.

     

    Anybody but Ceci.

  9. ...but I reel with my right. I suffered a bad injury to my right shoulder a few years back......I turned around all my lines.

    Rick

     

    Ditto. When my right arm was injured, I didn't want to stress it any further by casting *and* fighting a fish with my right hand. Since I catch a fish on average, every second cast, I decided to switch up. Now that my arm is better, I never found a reason to go back.

     

    Interesting tidbit......clasp your hands together, interlocking your fingers......

     

    Now, take a look at which thumb is on top. Is it your right or left thumb? That hand is supposed to be your dominant hand even if you didn't think so. Try it the opposite way. Feels awkward, eh? The theory is that society teaches us to be right handed and kids grow up with teachers putting pencils in their right hand, etc.

     

    I found that when I spring this on people without tell them and they say they are right handed but their left thumb in on top, I ask them if they do the occasional thing left handed (hold a hockey stick, etc.) they almost always say they do.

     

    Any closet south paws here?

×
×
  • Create New...