Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

McLeod

Members
  • Posts

    308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by McLeod

  1. And there you go man, the Bow, the Crow, the lower OM, Barnaby Ridge, Bullshead etc. are just places I'd go to placate a fishin' itch or curiosity. The upper OM, Upper Belly, Mcleod, Freeman, Kakwa are all places I'd go to fish for something truly unique.

    Like I said ..It's matter of your opinion..which I get where your coming from..

    but each to there own. Just asks those who worship those waters that hold Goldens and the experience the journey to reach those waters.

    • Like 1
  2.  

    Thus this thread comes fill circle !

    The title of the thread is distasteful..pardon the pun because Brookies are very good eating..

    Jim's work and other is commendable and I strongly support the projects to bring back native species where it can be done with an a high rate of success.

     

    But thus the problem that is created is that there are those who don't get it.

    While in certain situations such as Quirk ,non natives should be removed.. the species and in this case ..the brook trout ..is a prized game fish that in other waters should be treated as a treasured resource. I always fear that those Brookie bashers don't get it . They don't realize that this project is about restoring natives in their traditional flowing water not to create a mentality the Brookie trout are trash and should be destroyed every where they are found.

    • Like 4
  3. One more Willow report;

     

    27 brookies 5 cutthroat in 5 hrs, fish ranged from 15 to 30 cms and still all on a muddler. Nice to see a few more cutts. Walked in about 5-6k and fished back.

     

    Peter, lookin' forward to it.

     

    McLeod, thought about thumpin' it, it was legal size but not quite sure about the legalities or explanations required about possessing 25 any size brook trout and 2 rainbows over 30 cm.

     

     

    Considering what Jim's goal is it make no sense to have a MIN size limit on the Rainbows.

  4.  

    Not an oil expert by any means but.. If a pipeline is 50 years olds and it 's under a river..

    Can I conclude that with corosion , heat /cold , movement in the ground due to water pressure , possible fault lines ect that pipelines in these locations are more likely to crack and leak then those under just a piece of land ?

  5. In all seriousness, run-off is one of the main reasons bio's are worried about brook trout. They are pre-adapted to our climate and weather patterns. In the spring, the rainbows spawn and run-off happens about the same time. A crapload of the eggs get killed off by the increasing silt in the water. In the fall however, there is no run off and this is when the brookies spawn. Turns out that a much larger proportion of brook trout eggs survive. In the end, the more brook trout there are, the more competition for food.......

     

     

     

    Be interested to find out who or where you heard this from. Only in the Athabasca River System would one even consider that possibility.

    Anywhere south the Rainbows are just as Non native as the Brookies so there is no validity to that statement that bio's are worried about it. Maybe your thinking of Cutties ?

  6. Depends on the mgmt goal. Personally, I favour "one under" and not "one over" regulations but if the pop'n can handle the potential loss, doesn't really matter. I signed the dam petition anyway so I guess I can't bitch haha.

     

    If you want fish meat, go to a pothole or smack some walleye on the head, you're paying for em.

     

     

    The public is paying for this lake to be stocked as well so there has to be some sort of happy medium.

     

×
×
  • Create New...