Been following the back and forth between GB and Andersen and if nothing else it
shows how the Klein + years have thrown away years of hard work through
the slash and burn of the various departments especially fish and wildlife.
It is like aging a good bottle of wine and then throwing it on the floor. There seems
to be very little interest in providing budget funds so that this important
monitoring can be undertaken again and if it were to start it would be 5 -10
years before the data would be useful to indentify problems. Hell they don't
even have potable water mapped out which impacts far more Albertans than
a spring creek. The recent election shows how happy Albertans are with the current
rule and Ed himself intrepreted the 61% that stayed home as people that were
happy with things the way they are and that is why they didn't vote! So.....
following Ed's logic they should be campaigning in the next election to have 1%
vote Conservative and have the other 99% stay home and intrepret that as everyone
being estatic with their rule. I do agree with GB. If you are looking to science
to explore solutions to a problem you need good benchline data from which to start.
Anything else from a result standpoint will not stand the test of peer review.
It is peer review that provides the credibility to move to the next stage...what
ever that may be. My 10 cents.
PS... How many on this site voted and for which party? Someone should run a poll.
Second thought cancel that. We all know the value of polls.