DonAndersen Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 Sunday Telegraph Article: Salute to a brave and modest nation By Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph, London Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region. As always, Canada will bury its dead and the rest of the world, as always, will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does. It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid of both its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions ... it seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved. Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle. Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular memory as somehow or other the work of the 'British.' The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attacks. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third largest navy and the fourth largest air force in the world. The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not even participated ... a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has long since abandoned, as it has no notion of a separate Canadian identity. So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality ... unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter, and Dan Aykroyd have, in the popular perception, become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers. Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves (but are unheard by anyone else) that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half-century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth ... in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties ... from Vietnam to East Timor, from the Sinai to Bosnia. [And the writer doesn't even mention Lester B. Pearson and his role in defusing the Suez Crisis in 1957. Pearson was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the selection committee claiming that Pearson had ‘saved the world.' The United Nations Emergency Force was Pearson's creation, and he is considered the father of the modern concept of peacekeeping.] So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbor has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honorable things for honorable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun. It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honor comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too well. Quote
kungfool Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 Canada has so much to be proud of. I believe our peacekeeping missions, and our past involvements in WWI and WWII are simply not acknowledged by many around the world simply because we don't talk about it much, and we have not fixated on them in our media, especially in the theaters and on television. Lets face it, most people's education these days comes from the TV. Some of this has to do with Canada not having a large presence in the movie industry, and a lot to do with how humble we are as a people. I say be proud that others do not know of the sacrifices that so many Canadians have given, and are giving . It says so much more than those who shout to the world "Look at what we have done!". As for our troops being in Afghanistan, Its an absolute disgrace and an tarnishes Canada's good reputation. It's a good thing to help out your neighbors when they are in the right, but its another when they are NOT especially when those in charge know it. Please don't take this the wrong way, I am deeply saddened by any Canadian soldiers death and my heart goes out to their family and friends. They are brave and noble persons who are simply doing their job. Quote
reevesr1 Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 Hey Don, I knew. I am proud to live here and call it my second home. My undying thanks to all current, past and future members of your Armed Forces. Rick Reeves, USN, ET1(SS) 1980-1988 Quote
lonefisher Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 I really like that article..... hate to ask a stupid question but is that from London England or London Ontario? Quote
reevesr1 Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 Has to be England. Written from a British perspective. Quote
DonAndersen Posted November 11, 2007 Author Posted November 11, 2007 Lone... London, UK See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jh...1/07/dt0701.xml T'aint no CDN who would write an article like that. We can't pat ourselves on the back. It's not CDN!!! Don Quote
lonefisher Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 LOL I was thinking the same thing myself actually..... it would have been kinda uncanadian like conduct...... None the less I appreciate seeing articles like that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.