lonefisher Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 So did anyone here hear that Stephen Colbert of the Colbert report is running for president? I guess he is only running in North Carolina? I dunno how that works as I am not overly familiar with the system but does this mean he is running with no hope of winning the prez? Or is it possible? Is it all a complete joke, or just pretty much a joke? In any rate I find him pretty funny but I just don't know what the logistics behind this is..... Figured I'd bring it up as maybe some of you watch his show. http://tv.yahoo.com/the-colbert-report/sho...86e08e94b7e__ER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bigbadbrent Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 south carolina..btw lol colberts the man it's probably a big joke, but he'd still be better then W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenbow Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Couldn't tell you if it's any more than a gag, but I think the guy would actually be great. I can't get enough of that show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonefisher Posted October 21, 2007 Author Share Posted October 21, 2007 well I could definately say that talking about doing it being a gag but to actually do it. He must have some hopes of it actually working..... Maybe Rickr will explain the presidential process to me or someone else familiar with the system..... I do know that it basically comes down to 2 guys in the big vote but what is the process to weed out the others? And can a candidate actually make it through with only running in one state? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bigbadbrent Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 i think he's only campaiging in his home state, doesnt want to go around the country Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weedy1 Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Hey if this guy can run California I'm sure Colbert could easily run the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonefisher Posted October 21, 2007 Author Share Posted October 21, 2007 LMFAO..... I might have just found my new avatar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reevesr1 Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 So here is the process: Each party has several candidates who compete in a swimsuit contest.. Ok, so they compete in a series of "primaries" or "caucuses" in several states to determine how these states will vote in each parties "Convention". Kinda like a series of popularity contests. However, once the first vote of the convention goes down, each state can change their vote to whatever candidate they wish. (Big states have lots of delegates, small states not so many). So each party ends up with one candidate who then face each other (and possibly a meaningless 3rd party candidate) in a general election. Most votes wins right? Well, not really. The election is really 50 separate elections in each state. Each state has a number of "Electoral College" votes. These votes determine the next president. So it is possible to loose the popular vote and still be president. It happened to Bush (and some would say it's happened twice to Bush), but that is a whole other topic. So there is election civics in a nutshell. If I explain more, it just gets more confusing. Colbert is running a joke candidacy. He is actually trying to register as a candidate in both parties for the North Carolina primary I think. Very funny stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonefisher Posted October 21, 2007 Author Share Posted October 21, 2007 LOL ok I understand pretty much I think. So even if everything that could go his way did go his way he would still not realistically be able to win..... Thats a shame LOL it may not be the right thing for the country but man would it ever be funny to see him running the show.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headscan Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I think I also read somewhere that he would have to give up his show if he was serious. Rules about fair airtime or something. Probably the same reason Fred Thompson left Law and Order. The whole thing reminds me of that Robin Williams movie - Man of the Year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bigbadbrent Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 cept man of the year sucked...terrible movie I dont think its true about having to give up the show, otherwise no law and order reruns could go on either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headscan Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Just found the story I read about it. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1007/6450.html He'd just have to stop talking about it on the show. Guess Thompson left Law and Order for other reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Each state has a number of "Electoral College" votes. These votes determine the next president. So it is possible to loose the popular vote and still be president. It happened to Bush (and some would say it's happened twice to Bush), but that is a whole other topic. So there is election civics in a nutshell. If I explain more, it just gets more confusing. Colbert is running a joke candidacy. He is actually trying to register as a candidate in both parties for the North Carolina primary I think. Very funny stuff. The electoral college usually votes for the candidate winning the popular vote in each state, but there is no requirement for them to do so. The basics of it is the founders of democracy didn't believe that the great unwashed were smart enough to make a responsible decision. So there it is, the great defenders of democracy in the world are paranoid about the process. Then again Mickey Mouse would usually win a plurality with a write in ballot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reevesr1 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 The electoral college usually votes for the candidate winning the popular vote in each state, but there is no requirement for them to do so. The basics of it is the founders of democracy didn't believe that the great unwashed were smart enough to make a responsible decision. So there it is, the great defenders of democracy in the world are paranoid about the process. Then again Mickey Mouse would usually win a plurality with a write in ballot. They are not required to do so, but I don't think that any state has ever gone against the popular vote for electoral college votes. You seem a bit cynical there Gary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.