Guest NamasteMushroom Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 There has been so much talk about the 'world is round' issue, I think we need to have a discussion 'of scientific consensus' about this issue...looking at both sides. The Scientific community, in their quest for funding has proposed that the world is flat. What we, as nonscientists need to do is look at their work objectively, it doesn't matter what NASA, geologists etc. might say. The world has been flat for thousands of years....how can, in only a few hundred years this change when our records clearly indicate the world has been flat since time began. We, as human beings certainly don't have the ability to change the shape of the world? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbowtrout Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 world has been flat since time began. We, as human beings certainly don't have the ability to change the shape I strongly disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefrog Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I think most of the confusion centers around the term 'round'. If, in fact, people would have been properly educated with the facts, the term 'oblate spheroid' would have been used instead. Alas, the damage has been done, and and there's no turning back now. Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonAndersen Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Glen Beck says its flat - enough said. Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grinr Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 SK is flat,AB.....not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 420FLYFISHIN Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 ummm, can i get your guys dealer #? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangler Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 There has been so much talk about the 'world is round' issue, I think we need to have a discussion 'of scientific consensus' about this issue...looking at both sides. The Scientific community, in their quest for funding has proposed that the world is flat. What we, as nonscientists need to do is look at their work objectively, it doesn't matter what NASA, geologists etc. might say. The world has been flat for thousands of years....how can, in only a few hundred years this change when our records clearly indicate the world has been flat since time began. We, as human beings certainly don't have the ability to change the shape of the world? Clearly the shape of the world has been changing for millenia. The question is whether the changes over the last 100 years have been accelerated by man or are rather due to a natural cycle that we simply don't understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWilloughby Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 The good ship Crimson Mutual Assurance sailed off of the edge of the world clearly demonstrating that the world is flat as documented in "The Meaning of Life" by M. Python. What other proof is needed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.