robertboyce

This is the last day to submit input to this phase of the landuse plan that covers the eastern slopes from more or less Calgary south. Looks like the online workbook is still open to comments until the end of today.

Thanks for taking the time to work on the workbook and trying to submit it. Did this location finally get it sorted out or were you able to submit it some other way? So far I’ve had a better experience with the system so this is a little disappointing.

Hi ÜberFly. I've a different understanding of how the SSRP and its process could affect OHV use and the other items currently under discussion. I don’t believe that I am able to say that any particular user group will see changes just yet. I’ll explain my reason for saying this. I’m hypothesizing that you have read either the Regional Advisory Council (RAC) Advise-to-Government document or the workbook because both contain discussions on OHV use. The workbook is more or less based on the RAC advice. The government has said that the RAC advice is not government’s perspective and not the Regional Plan. It’s the RAC advice only. The provincial government intends to take the RAC advice and all the information received during this Phase II consultation all together to prepare the draft Regional Plan. This feedback includes workbooks, position papers, other documents, letters, public session feedback, stakeholder session feedback, etc. Many groups are taking this phase of consultation quite seriously and are maximizing their influence by organizing and attending consultation sessions and through direct submissions to government (like the workbooks). If this collective feedback is significantly different from the RAC advice the content of the draft Regional Plan could look quite different compared with the material currently in circulation. For this reason I believe that if we like something in the workbook we need to show it and if we dislike something we need to state that as well. Once the draft Regional Plan is built another round of consultations will occur. After feedback from those consultations is considered the Plan will be finalized and sent to cabinet for approval. After that the Plan becomes law.

Here is an article from today's Calgary Herald (thanks bcube). It is about the Hidden Creek timber harvest situation. It describes why some feel logging this area is unacceptable and presents the government and industry responses. At the end of the article there is a statement "he <Duncan MacDonnell, ESRD Public Affairs Officer> noted that the ongoing review of the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan, which will set out land-use policies for the area south of Calgary, could potentially lead to future changes.” I feel like I have a fantastic opportunity to be heard through the regional planning process and I'm hoping to sway some more folks to feel the same way. Pls don’t let it go by without sharing your thoughts. All of us together are more intelligent than any one of us. The article: http://www.calgaryhe...1745/story.html

For convenience here is the nearest link I could find for the printable/downloadable copy of the workbook: https://www.landuse.alberta.ca/Newsroom/Pages/PublicConsultations.aspx The actual link to the work book is just above the image with the haybales part way down the page. Sorry, the file was too large to attach to to a post. If a person chooses to submit a hard copy they can do so here: SSRP Phase 2 Workbook Land Use Secretariat 9th Floor, 10035 – 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3E2 The workbook may also be submitted at any local Government of Alberta office.

For people’s convenience here is the direct link to the online version of the workbook: http://www.banister.ab.ca/SSRPworkbookphase2/

We have a fantastic opprotunity to directly address some of the long standing backcountry use and conservation issues through the provincial governments South Saskatchewan Regional Planning process. This is a Land use Plan. The government is craving input and has created a formal and what I think is an excellent process to receive it. Primarily through what's called the Phase II consultation workbook and the Phase II Consultation Sessions occuring around southern Alberta. I've been lucky enough to attend a few of their stakeholder sessions along the east slopes and can say that i don't recall seeing anybody from the angling community. Not a guide, not an ENGO, not an angler. Not to say they were not there or not at another event but this user group was certainly not conspicuous. Several other ENGOs, municipalities, industry, landowners, land trusts, etc. were all present and ensuring that their messages were heard. The OHV folks were present as well. The few I spoke with were very well prepared and I suspect represent the more responsible folks. All their voices have been heard. I worry that input from the the people in this community have not. Please take the time to submit one of these workbooks. They can be online or hard copy. Numbers matter! The more voices sharing your values the more likely things will change. You do not need to complete the entire book….the government has stated that it will happily accept information in partially completed workbooks. Complete the portions where you have an opinion. The deadline is December 21, 2012. This information can be found here: https://www.landuse....es/default.aspx

Thanks Hawgstoppah. At the risk of ostracizing myself I do feel that this forum can be heavy on words and light on action sometimes. My apologies in advance to those that are more active. Here are some activities that I am aware of that we could do to become more involved (in addition to moaning ): South Saskatchewan Regional Plan Phase II Workbook. For the love of all backcountry management please take the time to submit one of these workbooks. They can be online or hard copy. Numbers matter! The more voices sharing your values the more likely things will change. You do not need to complete the entire book….the government has stated that it will happily accept information in partially completed workbooks. Complete the portions where you have an opinion. The deadline is December 21, 2012. This information can be found here: https://www.landuse....es/default.aspx Actively write your MLA and senior people in Environment and Sustainable Resources Development when you become aware of an issue, include photos and data if possible (e.g. Hidden Creek in the upper Oldman was just reopened for clear cut timber harvest which is occurring right now as I understand it.....I've read that in some years +/- 78% of adult migratory bull trout in the upper Oldman system spawn here. I hope there's a proper plan in place for this harvest. See here for a little more information on this creek and the overall drainage: http://www.ab-conser...ldman-drainage/) Become active in a conservation group that shares common values (F&G Associations, TUC, AWA, ACA, etc.) Learn more about/participate in the Stewardship License Pilot Project under ESRD Fisheries and TUC (harvesting brookies to make space for native species) Learn more about/participate in the Upper Oldman River bull trout tagging project under ESRD Fisheries – volunteers are needed Support existing programs that have had success in specific sectors (e.g. Cows and Fish) Work to educate your peers (e.g. if you’re an OHV user promote the tires-on-trails philosophy) I have some direct in a few of these (1,3,4,5) and would be happy to chat with folks and share the bit that I've seen.

Some thoughts. Earlier this year I received my stewardship license and was intrigued by a note indicating that barbed hooks do not significantly increase hooking mortality. I had a hard time believing this and ended up corresponding with a number of fisheries folks all over the place reading a number of studies and all this changed my view of the situation. I agree with Dave and Rick in that, based on the work I have seen, there is no significant difference in mortality between barbed and barbless hooks. Interestingly enough there is more than one peer reviewed study showing that hook configuration vs. hooking mortality is a highly variable situation. In more than one study, in both marine and freshwater systems, a barbless single hook was found to produce a higher level of hooking mortality than a barbed treble hook. I know it sounds odd. I didn’t start using treble hooks but this did make me think that there was more than I understood happening here and maybe I wasn't quite as clever as I thought I was. I also agree with shredneck et al in that there is likely a difference between hooking mortality and injury and that there may be reasons other than mortality to use a barbless hook. There are fish swimming around that have lost their maxilla and have scars but they are still alive and healthy. This is exactly why using a barbless hook is not illegal in Alberta. I feel like this notion of barbless being illegal sounds odd but in some countries catch-and-release is illegal and if you’re caught releasing a fish you’ll be fined and shamed by your peers. BTW I would choose the barbless hook if you were sticking one in my hand. There are other factors that consistently come up as causing increases in hooking mortality. I recall water temperature and duration needed to land the fish being the two consistent factors especially when they work together. A long fight in warm water is big trouble for a trout. If this is correct than a coveted 20” fish landed on 5/6x is likely at a higher risk of dying than the one cranked in with a spinning rod and a barbed treble hook. I appreciate that studies are not perfect and that they need to be read with care. The world is filled with people studying everything and announcing their results as fact and that a study may not reflect what’s happening on the ground. I ended up feeling that enough work had been done by enough people in enough places that barbed vs. barbless was just not a significant factor in a fishes likelihood of dying after being caught through angling. If I choose to use barbless it had to be for a reason other than mortality and that forcing people to go barbless may not be a useful tool. In the end I ended up feeling a bit bad about pushing barbless single hooks in the past. I really didn't know as much as I thought I did. I've ended up appreciating the fact that the spin caster using a barbed panter martin or spoon may well be causing no more risk to the fishes lives and me and a fly and in fact occasionally using light lines with big fish likely made me the culprit in the death of more than one trout. I’m fine with dropping the barbless regulation so long as I can still use barbless when I choose to do so. I feel that there are likely other areas that would give us more conservation benefit like education and habitat preservation for example. I would love to see education required before obtaining an angling license in Alberta, especially for the east slopes.

This may seem like a ridiculous comment but I had a couple days that seemed to match this last fall and had success being a complete contrarian. We carefully fished a number of pools one particular day without success despite seeing many actively feeding cutts. Half joke/half desperation I tied on an enormous red bellied foam hopper that seemed to have absolutely no business being on the water this day and surprisingly enough if I cast it lightly into a spot with at least some character on the waters surface so it didn't splat it consistently produced fish. Not saying it's the way to go but it worked on this occasion (if anyone knows why this worked I'm all ears....).

Hi HeliTroutSlayer, Give this guy a call. Tell'em I sent you if you like. Kenton Neufeld Fisheries Biologist, Southern Rockies Area Fisheries Management Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Kenton.Neufeld@gov.ab.ca (403) 563-7013 Line up a date with him and away you go. Good luck, Robert

I've been using a furled leader with a tenkara rod and dries found it a lot of fun. Vy nice to cast and vy effective for fly control with this type of set up.

Tkx for the thoughts. I'm comfortable removing flies but once in a while a fish squirms at the right moment while I'm holding the fly to remove it and I wreck the fly/mess up the hackle, etc. Perhaps I'm off on my technique. Any thoughts on this? This was the reason I originally tried this tool....seems to protect the fly in the tube during removal....but like many folks I've been able to remove the hooks without it so it stays at home in a drawer.

Sorry about that. Still learning how to use FFC. Here are a couple more.

My wife picked up an Olympus Tough Guy (TG) for me with some reward points. I think mine is the entry 310 model. It works okay out of the water but seems to work really well under the water. I've not abused it too badly but I've submerged it several times, dropped once from a little higher than I would have liked and it still seems to work fine. The battery has served me well. Connects to the macbook without issues, etc. I'll see if I can shrink a couple pics down and post them.