Come on man, if it was about protecting the fisheries - they would have made them Class I or at the very least applied the Class II rules equally to locals, who have always had at least 50% of the traffic on the river.
Its clear by the way that this was rammed in, without even consulting the city councils of Kimberly and Cranbrook - even though the St Mary's runs between them, that this was the case of some local guides who were bummed that their clients weren't happy with seeing recreational fisherman on the river. There was no science presented - nor has there ever been.
As for the Classified Water regs leading to river improvement - we both know that it was a different change - where angling license revenue which used to go directly to BC general revenues, started instead being used directly for fisheries management. They both happened around the same time. It was the latter that has led to the improvements you refer to.
If people want to know what 30,000 BC Wildlife Federation Members pledged in 2005: How about,
To Non-Residents:
This province has world-class angling and some of the most beautiful scenery to offer today’s discerning travelers. The promotion of BC’s fishing opportunities to outdoor enthusiasts from the rest of Canada and around the world is very important to our economy. The fiscal benefits derived from angling tourism are often to smaller more rural communities that would not see such revenue without visiting anglers and provide jobs in areas where often unemployment runs higher.
and
Decreasing License Sales:
As unpleasant a truth as it may be, the fact remains that freshwater and tidal license sales have been dropping for more than a decade and less people are fishing. Dropping license sales coupled with the further challenge of less young people being recruited to the sport of fishing during that same time frame, results in an aging angler demographic. This reality could spell a future tumble in participation and a steep decline in revenue (to all support sectors including government).