Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

Flyfisher

Members
  • Posts

    274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by Flyfisher

  1.  

     

     

     

    That I do quite a bit... Is there a simple technique change to fix this?

     

    All you have to do is simply strip (pull line) straight off the reel (parallel to the rod rather than perpendicular to it). In other words pulling it off just like it comes off when you've got fish on the reel. Believe, your line will last much longer!

  2. Simms vibram soles without studs are outright dangerous on slick and slimy rocks, no where's near the traction of felt. Tried em brought back and went with felt. The Patagonia boot above looks interesting and if what bcube says is true it might be a good alternative to felt. Vibram alone isn't.

  3. They were likely taking subsurface emergers (it was raining, mayflies?). In addition to a hare's ear try an unweighted soft hackle sized to what you know or think might be going off or what they're eating.

     

    Sounds like some kind of dandelion or cottonwood type seed tufts were floating on the water. I've found fuzzy seed tuft material inside fish, suspect the material gets mistaken for some kind of food item.

  4. One suggestion that may help, try to find a place you can fling a few casts from shore for a while.... and mix that in with wading in your "run" that you want to fish... each time you even start feeling a bit cold step out, walk around get that blood flowing... flick some casts off shore or just walk about a bit warm up and take a look away from the river and take it all in, some great sights to see along the river if we take the time to enjoy them :)

     

    Good suggestion and the only thing that really helps, no matter what socks used and loose fitting boots. I've always been prone to cold feet and hands. You gotta move...

  5. We can agree to disagree on an issue. So lets keep to the issue instead of personal attacks. There's nothing meaningful to be gained from back and forth sparing unrelated to the issue. If someone has misunderstood or misinterpreted something I've said I'll try my best to clarify my position. Respect for fellow anglers. It can only be good for fish.

    • Like 1
  6. I personally am against barbed hooks for catch and release simply because of the damage I've seen. I've guided in Ontario, BC and Alberta and witnessed fishers who get frustrated because a barb is stuck in a fish. The result is ripping it out, instead of taking the time to extract it properly, it does take time to do properly . The other problem is barbed hooks take longer to extract resulting in a fish being out of water longer. A deterrent to catch and release.

     

    My thoughts exactly - a good enough reason to keep the barbless hook regulation in place, at the least on heavily pressured fisheries such as the Livingstone R. and others like it.

     

    I'm not so sure anyone knows definitively (Not Dave Jensen or the biologists he refers to.) what difference barbed versus barbless has on mortality rate in all situations on all fisheries. What Dave and the biologists do know is that their science/studiy to date does not support the idea that barbless reduces fish mortality in anything more than a negligible way across the board, albiet with the following caveat, " - all you have to remember is to treat the fish gently and keep it in the water." In a perfect world, I could accept that, even in the face of being suspect that the science/studies that Dave and the biologists he refers to may be incomplete in that it lacks realife control groups. In addition Dave and the biologists may not be taking into account aesthetics, something SilverDoctor touched on, not to mention the energy reserve of a fish. In other words I would argue that barbed hooks contribute to beat up low energy fish in heavily pressured catch and release fisheries. Couple that with the fact/trend that more and more Westslope cutthroat trout, particularly in heavily pressured fisheries, have to pose for a variety of photo ops after being caught (checkout Youtube and fly fishing sites such as this one to get may drift) along with what SilverDoctor here has witnessed over the course of his years (which in my view I share) I would take the precautionary principle and keep the barbless regulation in place. With all due respect I find the view here presented by Dave Jensen to be a little narrow.

     

    Best fishes, Paul

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...