AndyW Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Alberta's human-caused grizzlies deaths at three-year high By Jason Markusoff, Calgary HeraldFebruary 2, 2009 http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Techn...877/story.html Conservationists are raising alarm about the highest human-caused death toll of Alberta grizzly bears since the provincial government suspended the grizzly hunt three years ago. By accident, self-defence or other means, people killed 19 grizzlies last year, up from nine in 2007, according to data Alberta Sustainable Resource Development released late last month. Carl Morrison of the Action Grizzly Bear alliance said the statistics suggest the ministry needs to do much more to prevent more losses in the iconic creature’s dwindling population. “Obviously that’s fundamental in recovering the species: that we gain more bears than we lose each year,” Morrison said today. “And with the numbers of bears we saw disappear last year, that’s not the case.” The province began its grizzly recovery plan in 2007, and has been mapping our the bear habitats so it can define where it should limit car and human access. It has also launched extensive education programs to curb human-grizzly conflicts. Morrison said the studies are happening too slowly and the guidelines are too lax. Last year’s human-related grizzly mortalities were the most since 2005, when 10 of the 24 deaths were by licensed hunters in the last year of the legal grizzly hunt. In 2008, six grizzlies were put down because they were posing risks to humans, another six were killed in self defence, and four by accident. Others were killed by aboriginal subsistence hunters, in an illegal kill, or for unknown reasons. jmarkusoff@theherald.canwest.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamIam Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 “Obviously that’s fundamental in recovering the species: that we gain more bears than we lose each year,” Morrison said today. “And with the numbers of bears we saw disappear last year, that’s not the case.” In order to make this statement, wouldn't he need to know what the total number of bears gained was? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 "Morrison said the studies are happening too slowly and the guidelines are too lax." Perhaps instead of sitting at his donation accepting desk, pontificating, he could head out with biologists into known "grizz country" and assist in gathering hair samples on "rub trees", document the samples, map the locations and submit the credible documentation for DNA testing and submission to the counts. j Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.