Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

wtforward

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wtforward

  1. Anybody going to Poppy's clave ? Looking for some gas sharing. Great chance to

    to try and 'fish one up' on the long line if so inclined. Gorran A the Scandi Master

    is going to be there. I have been before and you get to see how the big boys do it

    plus it just a lot of fun. Send a pm if interested.

     

    t

  2. You mean you finally retired the HMH. Shame on you.

    That is a lot of flies for 2 patterns. :peesout:

     

     

     

    eastman,

     

    I've a Barracuda. Had it for about 10 years. Tied several thousand flies on it. Works well. The jaws that came with it have 2 hook pockets for holding very large hooks. I also have a midge set of jaws for hooks <18's.

     

     

    Don

  3. DutchDryFly

     

    To each his own but I would never ever use UPS. USPS dovetails very

    well with Canada Post in my experience. I have had rods, reels etc

    out of the US always coming USPS and have never had a problem.

    The customs clearance fees from UPS are out of site and I refuse

    to buy US side if they use UPS. Maybe it is just me. FedEx is not

    any better than USPS in my experience. Last rod US to my door

    7 days USPS.

  4. If you are on the look out for a quality Tapered Loop UE Salmon/Steelhead wet fly

    hook , take a look at the Gamakatsu T10-6H. They are a fine first

    class hook and are scary sharp. Same class as the TMC 7999

    and the Mustad 36890 but from a finish and sharpness standpoint I think the

    Gama is the clear winner. This is going to be my go to hook for a lot

    of my wet patterns. But everybody has their personal favourites.

    I don't sell them and have no association with them what so ever.

  5. Sun

     

    From one of the most prestigious science journals (the other day)

    that some people access daily "The Calgary Sun" I see that AP

    has done a review of said e-mails (some million words I think)

    and found nothing substantially erroneous to discredit the current

    science findings. Does that count for nothing ? Maybe they are part

    of the conspiracy too. As to geologists weighing in on climate change matters;

    that is fine, everyone has an opinion but I think it gets a little

    dangerous when we go to the ear/nose and throat guy for a

    brain tumor. But hey they are both doctors and practice medicine.

    You should be ok.

     

    PS Have you read the book yet ? Wanna borrow my copy...seriously ?

    The great thing about the book is that you can read it as a fiction if you like.

  6. Before closing the thread may I offer up a very interesting read.

    Climate Cover-up by James Hoggan. I am not condoning being

    "Jonesed" ... the outrage speaks for itself but if you want a glimpse

    of how the real big boys play read the book. Some references

    to "reputable" go to disciples (suggested on this site) for the denier

    crowd are in for a little insight. Yes it is a view from the other side

    of the Grand Canyon and yes it deals with the "hockey stick"

    and it exposes how we are manipulated given what is at stake.

    If after reading the book and you are still comfortable with your stand

    fine. The book is less than a flat of beer and it

    is the cheapest tuition fee on climate politics around. Suggest you

    read the book first then come back and do the poll thing considering

    what may or may not be at stake.

     

    It would have been an interesting question on the poll "How many have read

    the book ?"

     

    Cheers

    Tim

  7. The answer would be an easy yea.

     

    When a resource is finite...it's cost escalates. When the cost of the resource goes up...consumption goes down via either direct reduced consumption or more efficient use of said resource. This continues and continues...

     

    Sun

     

    I am assuming you have answered yes to the hypothetical poll.

     

    If you can get a finite resource's cost to escalate after it is all gone then

    quit wasting your time here .... your on to something.

     

    As to my list I was thinking along the lines of using you as my cap

    and trade partner and as long as I don't stray to far your

    positive enviro footprint should cancel out my negative. Sum

    gain zero. Saves me making a list. I would be willing to pay !

    Do you take paypal?

     

    Do you think GM is being a little hasty dumping the Hummer

    division on China? With all this climate warming BS and infinite

    resource they might be able to make a comeback here.

     

    What is it going to take to get you over from the dark side?

     

     

    Just kiddin on all of the above, were all just having some fun.

     

    "Good night, and Good Luck"

     

    Take care of yourself.

     

    Tim

  8. But you still miss the point........No one argues the need for sustainable, renewable, non carbon energy sources.........To suggest that we reduce carbon consumption based on the hoax of AGW is ridiculous........If you believe that the global warming scare and skewed science is justified in reducing carbon consumption then I guess you believe that lying to create an outcome, even though said outcome may be desirable is o.k............As Terry said, that's not how science is supposed to happen.........

    Don't you get the feeling that we are fiddling while Rome burns? Climate warming, climate cooling

    disigenious plot by those dasdardly climate scientists...who cares in the big picture if were talking about

    just us surviving. Maybe the end justifys the means. Would be interesting if someone ( I can't )

    would put up a yes or no poll for an unscientific garner on the following question. " Do you believe that

    if we take the population of India and China and add them to the North American population that there is enough carbon

    resources to sustain the increase in the current North American life style for say 100 years ?"

    Perhaps not relevant as no one here is going to be around but history and the next generation

    will be..hopefully and in what form is anyone's guess. I don't think we (as in this generation)

    are entitled to a bye as to this question. Yes I think we are seriously being duped and

    to continue to rail on Jones et al takes our attention away from the real big issue which

    is infinite growth in a capitalism enviroment funded by finite resources.

    Gotta go shovel snow..damn global cooling.

    The Doors tune sums it up for me "No one here gets out alive" :rolleyes:

  9. If one's measure of victory is which team changed the minds of the most people in the audience, then the con side won.

     

    :lol: :lol: Terry

     

    Priceless contribution...so much for baseball, hockey...hey the Grey Cup. I think the final after

    tally was on the pro side and they just squeaked by for whatever thats worth. Would not have

    expected anything different from the center of the universe.

    They should have held the debate in Nunavut. :rolleyes:

     

     

  10. Sun

     

    All rhetoric aside we can all goggle any particular position we

    care to support at any particular time. Sure data has been

    manipulated and destroyed...not good but we will get past it.

    It does not change the the fact that our society is buzzing

    along at warp speed and it still is not fast enough. Improve gas

    mileage on vehicles and we just drive further. I do it. More

    is better right ? Do you honestly believe that the earth can support

    the Current North American lifestyle with the addition of China and India ?

    There is not enough carbon resources to go around never mind

    that you probably could not breathe the air. Think Mexico city.

    The one problem I sense is that there is a brick

    wall out there, unfortunately I don't know how far out but we

    are going to hit it. Our whole existence is based on non-renewables

    and I don't think you will find many deniers. So what to do ?

    Continue to subsidize and prop up the non -renewable consumption

    or forge ahead and get off the carbon. Were going to spend the money anyway

    so why not direct it toward assisting a supportable, nature friendly,

    sustainable quality of life for the next generation. God knows we have

    had our day in the sun and maybe just maybe we should start introducing it

    ( the sun ) along with other renewables into our way of living on this rock.

    We need a level playing field for this to happen. Cut the carbon subsidies or

    at least direct some reasonable subsidies to renewables to help kick start.

    What could renewables do with what we are going to spend on a still unproven

    CO2 sequeestering experiement ?

    We are squandering our most precious commodity...time and yes we need carbon

    to buy us what little time we have left to make the transition. But no bones about

    it, we need to kick the carbon habit before it kicks us. It is definitely a

    moral and ethical decision for me. Denial is a very important coping mechanism

    that helps our survival otherwise in todays world some of us would not even get out

    of bed but carried too far and I think we can inflict irreparable harm as in

    cease to exist as a species. Techo fixes to carbon issues will not change

    the inevitable....at some point no carbons left.

     

    More rhetoric I know but take the time to watch and points scored

    on both sides don't even talk about botched Anglia CRU.

     

    http://www.munkdebates.com/

     

    Ohh and by the way 'tight lines'

  11. Sun

    I will leave it to you to update but the best I could find is about

    100+ hectares out of over 400,000 hectares officially certified

    as reclaimed. It may be better than that. But equally as important

    is the reclamation bonding held by the us maybe $500 million

    in total. Assuming $150,000 per hectare to reclaim and the

    above 400,000 (give or take) figure above you might conclude

    that Albertans are taking on more than their fair share of risk.

    I don't know if the 100+ hectares included any tailing area(s)

    which one would thing would be quite a bit more per hectare

    to reclaim.

  12. Yes what a travesty. But what concerns me is that because of 4+ player's

    exchange of e-mails the pseudo science is out the window ?? What about

    all the other 1496 soles who have spent their entire lives working in the field?

    Are they all in this conspiracy together? Is some of there findings crap also ?

    I am not condoning their actvities and my own position is of no importance

    but I think considering what may be at stake we still need climate science

    to continue if for no other reason than to refute civilization's activities contributing

    towards global warming. That might not be possible if sources of funding

    dry up. The climate science community really needs to stand up and renounce

    the serious lack of judgment of these individuals and insure that their climate

    investigation careers are finished. Hey there is hope though, with this kind of stuff

    going on maybe, just maybe world oil supply has not peaked either.

  13. Canadensis....On a more serious note and not to beat up on Timmies

    but check out the paper filter they use to make the coffee...bleached

    white as opposed the unbleached brown option. Health issue don't know

    but I do know they are way behind Starbucks in recycling their coffee grounds.

    It would be interesting to know the tons of good compostable coffee grounds

    from Timmies that end up in the dump in Canada complete with the bleached

    white filters intact. I regularly pick up coffee grounds for free from Strabucks

    (their program and fair trade), nicely packaged, for the garden,

    plants etc. The stuff is great and it works. I phoned Timmies down east about them getting

    with the program. Their working on it; that was 8 months ago.

    I suspect it's a hassle for them and the line ups aren't getting any shorter anyway.

     

  14. When you are at the trough why would you step out of line ?

    Support for 'Old Topsoil' should come as no surprise. Wild

    Rose's Danielle Smith campaign included "changes to oil royalties that

    she said have sent investment dollars elsewhere". Same old same old.

    That should warm the cockles of everyone's heart. It's pouring outside

    and we should revisit royalties charged to oil companies. Maybe we should

    not charge anything to really spur on investment. Wasn't it a media savey person

    that got us to this point in the first place ? What I think is really sad is that

    there is no servant visionary in any party in this province

    that will risk moving the province out of the rut of our oil addicted

    economy. I guess we have to hit the wall first. Will the last one leaving

    please turn out the lights.

  15. I may be urinating into the wind, but every time I hear or read that CO's don't get overtime, and they don't get enought money for gas, I can't help but think of schoolteachers. These people care so much about educating our children, it's uncommon for them NOT to work unpaid overtime, and pay out of pocket for supplies. I'm certainly not saying this is right, just that it would be heartening to see the same level of dedication from our CO's

     

    Rick

     

     

    Rick..This is a troll right ? :whistle:

  16. For a little deja vu have a read from the transcript of Hansard March 30, 2004.

    Scroll to Page 774 leading off with the Hon.Member of Edmonton-Strathcona,

    Dr. Pannu. Pages 774 to 776 and you should get the drift. Fast forward to

    now and ask your self what has really changed. Democracy does not work

    or is even remotely alive in this province and the Streamwatch program

    is a good as it gets unless there is a change and we all know what the

    chances of that happenning are.

     

    http://www.assembly.ab.ca/ISYS/LADDAR_file...1330_01_han.pdf

  17. Joshua

     

    If you start your quest do not pass up the opportunity to try the

    Sage 5110-4 Z Axis. It will probably not be at your price point

    but I saw George Cook cast this config a mile. It truly was impressive.

    Did it all with the Rio AFS 5/6. Handles anything you could ever want

    in a Bow Switch rod (Skagit rig, overhead etc ). If you like the action it

    may give you a good reference point for some of the real good rods

    in the lower price range...and they are out there. Your current level

    of casting ability may also be a consideration. Get out and try some.

  18. Still got a ways to go before it becomes the law of the land and there

    was the odd recommendation that would be good for Skeena. Was

    a little disappointed that the rest of Canada is as non resident as

    all other countries. Overall though it would be pretty hard for provincial

    officials to not see the self serving direction the majority of the

    recommendations are taking ...where is a Bob Hooten type in the final

    decesion making group when you need one?

×
×
  • Create New...