Jump to content
Fly Fusion Forums

Whirllng Disease Confirmed In Bow River


Walton

Recommended Posts

http://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xID=433953CA3458B-B50E-57D4-A97FD2549BE284E2

 

CFIA confirms whirling disease in Bow River

Today, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), the lead federal agency responsible for preventing the spread of animal diseases within Canada, confirmed the presence of whirling disease in the upper Bow River, downstream from the confluence of the Bow River and Cascade River within Banff National Park.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutty lakes in Banff now closed.

 

It will be interesting when all the samples are done . i suspect its been around several years and spread . Most likely started in the bow but hopefully it has not spread into the Highwood.

Much more likely from hatchery fish stocked in a lake (Johnson etc....) but its possible a traveling angler may have brought it via dirty equipment from Colorado,Montana or elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a chance we'll never know for sure how it was introduced. Instead of playing CSI: Bow River we need to get the word out about cleaning gear and ditching felt to slow/stop the spread to other water bodies. Hopefully the province will also let other groups like OHV users know that they should be cleaning their vehicles after every trip. Lots of Jeep guys I know like to drive around muddy from their last trip because they think it makes them look cool.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if I'm wrong or not but I caught a whitefish about 20 years ago or so in the Bow across from Edworthy. It pretty much fit the bill for the description of whirling disease. It was twisted off to one side had a big hump/lump just behind the shoulders and the tail was kind of shrunken. I thought that it was caused by the chemicals coming into the river at that spot because it was by the sewage outlet from the U of C.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if I'm wrong or not but I caught a whitefish about 20 years ago or so in the Bow across from Edworthy. It pretty much fit the bill for the description of whirling disease. It was twisted off to one side had a big hump/lump just behind the shoulders and the tail was kind of shrunken. I thought that it was caused by the chemicals coming into the river at that spot because it was by the sewage outlet from the U of C.

Interesting -

I got one smallish brown earlier this year and one rainbow last year at POL that fit the description as well, with kinked/misaligned/humpy rear spines and shrunk tails. Didn't think much of it before all this whirling disease stuff hit the news and I began reading up on it... That said the deformities could have been caused by something else. I didn't take a tissue sample from the poor bastards. Looked like this pic: https://goo.gl/images/pGj0xI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading a bit about Whirling Disease, and it's been around for over a century in Europe. Kind of freaky that the higher-altitude areas seem to have the most difficult time with it. One point was that farmed fish (and hatchery fish) were the most susceptible, and that the fish parts of farmed fish run through garbage disposals still showed the spores. Surprised water treatment doesn't kill it off..?

 

A lot of the affected countries practice fish farming/stocking, so it was probably just a matter of time. Maybe the 'accidentally-stocked' fish from the early days of BNP had it and it's just now starting to proliferate due to the strange weather over the years? Where do the fish for stocking come from nowadays? Just thinking out loud. :)

 

http://www.protectyourwaters.net/hitchhikers/others_whirling_disease.php

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myxobolus_cerebralis

 

-M.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting -

I got one smallish brown earlier this year and one rainbow last year at POL that fit the description as well, with kinked/misaligned/humpy rear spines and shrunk tails. Didn't think much of it before all this whirling disease stuff hit the news and I began reading up on it... That said the deformities could have been caused by something else. I didn't take a tissue sample from the poor bastards. Looked like this pic: https://goo.gl/images/pGj0xI

Im pretty sure I caught couple fish like that in Arbour lake. I thought it was due to poor handling fish from bait chucker. These fish come from hatchery somewhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya i agree with you alan2 about 5 years ago someone posted a photo of a trout that he thought was deformed. It had the crooked back trout get that have whirling disease. I even commented that it looked like whirling disease and am thinking for sure it was now.

I would just like to add that we know dam well its been here for awhile they didn't just start testing out of the blue They know for years its been up here. they just didn't bother saying anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just like to add that we know dam well its been here for awhile they didn't just start testing out of the blue They know for years its been up here. they just didn't bother saying anything.

 

We knew hey? Maybe take off the tin-foil hat for one thread.

 

I won't argue that the province could have done a lot more to prevent this from happening, but suggesting we they kept us all deliberately in the dark for years is an absurd comment to make.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this mean that the fishing is going to go down the drain?

 

Most of the comments here seem fairly nonchalant, but apparently many rivers in Montana noticed the destruction of the rainbow population after the introduction of whirling disease. About 20 years later however the rainbow population is at 70% of the pre-disease levels.

 

Is this alarmist? How much of a threat is whirling disease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well maybe they didn't know years ago.

 

But that photo that was posted on here 4 or 5 years ago was differently a trout with whirling disease. I cant remember what it was posted under but all try and find it.

It was definitely a trout with whirling disease? Did you see the results from a necropsy study that proved that? I'm leaving this one to the biologists instead of a bunch of fishermen that think they may have caught a fish a bunch of years ago that looked kind of funny. Dealing with whirling disease can't be about what we feel, it needs to be about what we know. Right now we don't know enough to make any definitive statements one way or the other.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this mean that the fishing is going to go down the drain?

 

Most of the comments here seem fairly nonchalant, but apparently many rivers in Montana noticed the destruction of the rainbow population after the introduction of whirling disease. About 20 years later however the rainbow population is at 70% of the pre-disease levels.

 

Is this alarmist? How much of a threat is whirling disease?

It is a threat and it can potentially be devastating but there's no point in running around like your hair is on fire. What we need to do right now (like I said in my earlier post) is start to be diligent about cleaning gear between water bodies or even using different gear on the Bow than you do elsewhere.

 

http://whirlingdisease.montana.edu/about/faq.htm

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...